Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SocraticGadfly's avatar

Shock me that CherryRoad would close a paper. Given that the parent company is not a media company at all, I and some newspaper colleagues suspect their ultimate motive with many of their newspaper buys has been data mining or something similar. I know in this case they merged this with adjacent papers, but I'm still not surprised, and at least in part on the above grounds.

=

Corporate personhood is a tricky issue. In the case at hand, IMO, the easy solution would have been to award the fees to the publisher or owner, d/b/a The Sentinel, and if not possible due to the exact nature of the filing, then deny with a statement that the state supreme court would support a refiling.

That said, contra what many people think, corporate personhood is not absolute, and the flip side is that corporations qua corporations can be held legally liable on both civil and criminal cases. (Not that criminal charges often actually happen, at the federal level, at least.)

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?