Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matthew Schniper's avatar

As the local food writer, I thought I might be first to employ the phrase "leaves tongues wagging" — but you have beat me to it, sir. Touché!

Silence Dogood's avatar

Corey, you are woefully uneducated about facts in your Denver7 post. Let me correct a few errors.

"This week, three top people in the newsroom at Denver7, which also goes by the names KMGH and the Denver Channel, suddenly hit the bricks."

It doesn't go by the name the DenverChannel any longer, just by Denver7. And "hit the bricks"? Seriously? How about were let go or had their employment terminated.

"No public announcement, no teary on-air goodbyes."

They weren't on-air personalities so there is no expectation of an on-air goodbye. Same procedure for every news director or GM that this or nearly any other station ever had. Unless a manager had been at any particular station for 25+ years, there is rarely a mention on air of a departure.

"He (Brian Joyce) declined to offer any details about the circumstances of what he called a personnel matter."

Did you ask him directly or did you just read his email he sent to staff that you saw in FTV and didn't find the details you were looking for? If something similar happened in your department, would you spill all the details for someone to print?

"So, what exactly happened to these three remains an open question at this point."

What happened to the three managers is only an open question to you, not to the current staff who knows exactly what happened. They saw it happen. They were informed as to what happened and are looking forward to what is next.

"But the news appeared unexpected for Denver7 staff who apparently learned about it in a meeting this week and in a subsequent email from Joyce."

Yes, the firings were unexpected, however, the staff knew exactly what happened as it was happening. They could see what went on well before any meeting or official email from Brian.

"Scott Jones at the broadcast insider’s site FTVLive. (Jones wrote that the Denver7 triumvirate had been 'shown the door'.”

Scott made some general comments as he posted the Brian Joyce email that was sent to him from a current staff member. And your use of the word “triumvirate” is pompous and incorrect, as two of the managers let go are women, not men.

“'We don’t have any further comment at this time on specifics', Joyce said in an email about the latest shakeup in Denver. But, remember, he did say it was not part of a restructure, and the station is re-hiring for the three roles."

This is true, the firings were not part of any future corporate restructuring. Corporate has announced a restructuring plan which will most likely lead to some other layoffs. And why would three managers be let go and then their jobs be immediately posted if it was part of a larger restructure?

"As for the abruptly departed themselves, so far, silence."

What do you expect them to say? “Joy, I was let go from my job today!” When someone is let go, there is typically embarrassment. In a digital age, they most likely don't want to have more information out there to taint their future job prospects.

"A cell phone number I’ve used in the past for McRae has gone straight to voicemail since last weekend; I’ve heard it might not be operative anymore. Emails sent to potential Gmail addresses for Haaf and McRae found through a subscription people-search service went unanswered, as did requests to connect with all three on LinkedIn. I can’t be sure they saw my outreach."

If they want to reach out, which I doubt, they will. Ask yourself, what benefit is it to them to talk to you or any other media outlet about what happened? Will it help them get another job? Will it make them feel better about what happened? Don't hold your breath that they will contact you.

"For a local TV news station that could position itself as, well, something in the event of a destabilizing consolidation of FOX31 and 9NEWS, the unceremonious Denver7 news-side decapitation is a cringe-face emoji when it comes to timing."

Position itself as something? The station does have an identity, even if you don't care to see it. As for the 31/9 merger, the average viewer will likely not see much of a change. There will be a consolidation of some talent and production/office/sales staff, but Nextstar is not interested in killing the 9 brand. So the timing of this move has nothing to do with the impending merger of two competing companies and more about what is best for the future of the Denver7 news operation.

"It was 2023 when Denver7 hired away McRae, who then went by the last name Jurgemeyer, from 9NEWS where she was a news director."

Yes, she changed her name because she got married. Many women do that when they get married. Your sentence infers there is something sinister or nefarious about changing her name after leaving 9. It was several years after she left 9 that she got married and then changed her name.

"That didn’t last long."

It lasted about 2 1/2 years.

"Whether it remains as committed to letting Denver know what’s going on under the hood — and the extent to which that might even matter to its audience — well, you be the judge."

There is no expectation for E.W. Scripps to explain off-air personnel changes to you or anyone else. The only reason on-air changes are typically mentioned is because the anchors/reporters are part of the product. Those are decisions that matter to the audience. Do you expect to know when a sales manager leaves or if the desk manager goes somewhere else? Probably not so why then do you expect to know why the corporate managers decided to make a change to a local station? What happens with the on-air/on-line product will stay consistent for the time being. What happens in the future will be determined by corporate leadership and new local leadership when it is in place. You don't deserve an explanation just because you think you do.

I don't know you and this column is the first I've ever heard of you. It appears that you want to consider yourself a high-minded journalist. Your elevated ego is showing through and it would be warranted to remember that journalists are supposed to rely on facts, not speculation. If you want to be an opinion commentator, fine. Just state that up front and then call yourself an opinion columnist, not a journalist. Speculating about any situation, this situation or any other story, is fine as you are developing leads and gathering information. But speculation should be based on facts, which in this case you have very few. All the best.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?